Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the present Writ Petition due to the dismissal of Second Appeal No.4 of 1989. Leave was granted and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.4884 OF 2009
Office |
Notes, |
Office |
Court’s or |
Judge’s Orders |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Memorand |
a of |
Coram, |
||
appearanordersand Regi |
ces,or dstrar’s |
Court’sirectionsorders. |
||
Mr. Y.M. Khan Advoca |
te for Petitioner. |
|||
CORAM: K.K. |
TATED, J. |
|||
DATE : 29TH |
AUGUST, 2009. |
|||
1. Learned cou |
nsel for the Petitioner |
|||
seeks leave to withd |
raw present Writ Petition |
|||
because of dismissal |
of Second Appeal No.4 of |
|||
1989. Leave grant |
ed. Writ Petition is |
|||
disposed of as withd |
rawn. |
|||
[K.K. TATED, J.] |
||||
asb/AUG09/wp4884.09 |
Petitioner
Respondent
K.K. TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
