The High Court disposed of a writ petition based on an amicable settlement recorded in Consent Terms between the parties and their advocates, which were marked on record.
Consent Terms were taken on record and marked as 'X'; the writ petition was disposed of based on the settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4873 OF 1989
Shri Laxmikant Kashinath Dhume
Since deceased by his legal
representatives:
1-A.Smt.Neeta Laxmikant Dhume
& Ors. ...Petitioners
V/s.
Shri.Sudhir R.Deshpande & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.S.G.Deshmukh for Petitioners.
Mr.S.B.Prabhawalkar for Respondents 1 & 2.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
MARCH 13, 2009.
P.C.
1. Parties have arrived at amicable
settlement on terms recorded in the Consent Terms
dated 13th March 2009 handed in to the Court today.
The said Consent Terms are duly signed by the
parties as well as their Advocates.
2. Mr.Milind Ramesh Dhume, Constituted
Attorney of all the Petitioners is present in
: 2 :
Court. Similarly, both the Respondents are present
in Court. Both the parties accept the arrangement
recorded in the Consent Terms as arrived at with
full understanding.
3. Accordingly, Consent Terms taken on record
and marked ‘X’.
4. Petition disposed of on the basis of
Consent Terms.
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Laxmikant Kashinath Dhume
Shri Sudhir R. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court