Высокий суд штата Махараштра удовлетворил ходатайство ответчиков о защите по ходатайству, согласовавшемуся сторонами. Дело решено в соответствии с консенсусными условиями, представленными сторонами.
Петитвенное дело отменено на основании согласия сторон.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp-4691-09
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION W.P. NO.4691 OF 2009
Deshbhakt Ratnappa Kumbhar Panchaganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Ganganagar ..Petitioner Vs. Mr.Arvind Vishwanath Havale and Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. M.S.Topkar Adv. for Petitioner
Mr. Kiran Bapat Adv. i/b Mr.A.H.Fatangare Adv. for Respondent Nos.1 to 22.
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 16, 2009
P.C.:
amicably settled between the parties. They have tendered the consent terms duly signed by the parties and their counsel. The said consent terms are taken on record and marked `X' for identification. Writ petition is disposed of in terms of consent terms. Undertakings given therein by the parties, are accepted.
[ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Deshbhakt Ratnappa Kumbhar Panchaganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Ganganagar
Mr.Arvind Vishwanath Havale and Ors.
V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
