A writ petition was withdrawn by the petitioner following an order by the Deputy Commissioner, Pune, resulting in the disposal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
mss
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 3443 OF 2009
VITTHAL SHANKAR NADEKAR .. .. PETITIONERS Vs. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR & ORS. .. .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. A. S. Kulkarni for the petitioner
Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI &
A. A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED: 5/8/2009
P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the order
dated 10/7/09 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Pune, i.e. respondent 3, he has instructions to withdraw the petition. Copy of order dated 10/7/2009 is taken on record and marked "X".
2
In view of the above, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is
disposed of as such.
(Smt. Ranjana Desai, J.)
(A. A. Sayed, J.)
Vitthal Shankar Nadekar
The Deputy Collector & Ors.
Ranjana Desai
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
