Cite this judgement

Diamstar v. Union of (I) andORS., WP/3344/1990 (BOM), decided on 30 July 2009.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

F.I. Rebello and D.G. Karnik

Parties & counsel

Research

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

Diamstar Vs Union of (I) andORS. — Bombay HC (2009) — LawSathi Research

Home
Bombay HC
2009
Diamstar Vs Union of (I) andORS.Diamstar v. Union of (I) andORS.

Disposed

Diamstar v. Union of (I) andORS.

Bombay HC30 Jul 2009WP/3344/1990

Download

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶1

hvn

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 3344 OF 1990

M/s. Diamstar

... Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents

¶8

None for Petitioner.

¶9

Mr. P.S. Jetly with Mr. Rajinder Kumar for Respondents.

¶10

CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ.

¶11

DATED : JULY 30, 2009

¶12

P.C.

¶13

None appears for the Petitioner. Even otherwise considering the appearance

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
M/s. Diamstar
respondent
Union of India

Coram

AI extract

F.I. Rebello

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 30 Jul 2009 · July
Registered: 12 Dec 1212
Case no.: WP/3344/1990

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

Cite this judgement

Diamstar v. Union of (I) andORS., WP/3344/1990 (BOM), decided on 30 July 2009.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

F.I. Rebello and D.G. Karnik

Parties & counsel

Disposed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

¶14

for the Petitioner, no purpose would be served by serving notice on the Petitioner .

¶15

Considering that the goods have been released pursuant to the interim order of this court, Respondents are at liberty to complete the proceedings after giving due notice to the Petitioners.

¶16

With the above observations, Petition disposed of.

¶17

(D.G. KARNIK,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)

D.G. Karnik

CNR

HCBM020026741990

Bench

F.i. Rebello D.g. Karnik

Disposal

DISPOSED OFF

Yogesh Jindal Vs Union of(I) and Anr.

30 Jul 2009

Garden Silk Mills Ltd.and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.

30 Jul 2009

Diamstar v. Union of (I) andORS.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Vijay Kumar and Co. Vs Union of (I) and or

The Commissioner of Customs Vs Electronics Enterprises and Ors.

commissioner of central excise,mum-v Vs m/s zain plastics

Newtone Engg. Vs Anilkumar Asst. Collectorof Bombay and Ors.

Diamstar v. Union of (I) andORS.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Vijay Kumar and Co. Vs Union of (I) and or

The Commissioner of Customs Vs Electronics Enterprises and Ors.

commissioner of central excise,mum-v Vs m/s zain plastics

Newtone Engg. Vs Anilkumar Asst. Collectorof Bombay and Ors.

A compact analysis

Yogesh Jindal Vs Union of(I) and Anr.

Garden Silk Mills Ltd.and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.