The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking relief. The court relied on its earlier order stating that VSNL, as an employer, is not amenable to the court's jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, relief was denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2652 OF 2007
Jatya Pal Singh & Ors. V/s
Union India & Ors.
.. Petitioners.
.. Respondents
Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni i/by Mr.Vidyabhushan Mallick for the Petitioners. Mr.V.S.Masurkar with Mrs.Neeta Masurkar for Respondent No.1. Mr.K.S.Presswala i/by M/s.Mulla & Mulla & Cragie Blunt & Caroe for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH &
R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2009.
P.C.:
(D.K.DESHMUKH,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ court can grant relief to petitioners given its prior holding that VSNL is not amenable to its jurisdiction under Article 226.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jatya Pal Singh & Ors.
Union India & Ors.
D.K.Deshmukh
R.G.Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
