The Court disposed of a petition regarding the allocation of employees for election duty. The Court noted a settlement between parties agreeing to make 26% of employees available and found no further orders necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-(1)-
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2533 OF 2009
[Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee Vs. The Collector &
District Election Officer, Thane & Anr.]
---------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, office : Court’s or Judge’s orders
Memoranda of Coram, :
appearances, Court’s :
orders or directions :
and Registrar’s orders :
----------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.C.J.Sawant, Advocate i/b. Mr.N.N.
Bhadrashete, Advocate for the
petitioner.
Mr.Pradeep Rajagopal, Advocate for
Election commissioner.
Mr.V.S. Masurkar, G.P., for Respondent.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : 21ST APRIL,2009.
P.C.:-
1. This Court passed an order on 9th
April, 2009 allowing the respondents,
to take 25% of the employees for the
purpose of election duty. The parties
through their Counsel agreed that in
all 26% of the employees of the
petitioner corporation shall be made
available to the respondents for
-(2)-
election duty. In view of this
agreement between the parties, no
further orders need to be passed. Writ
Petition is disposed of.
[BILAL NAZKI, J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee
The Collector & District Election Officer, Thane
Anr.
Bilal Nazki
V.K.Ta希尔拉马尼
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court