This writ petition questioned a notice for unauthorized construction. The High Court disposed of the petition by directing the authority to consider the petitioner's reply and pass orders within six weeks.
Direction to the competent authority to consider the petitioner's reply and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2513 OF 2008
M/s. S.C. Motors
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and another.
.. Respondents
Mr. J.J. Shah for the petitioner. Ms. G.S. Joglekar for the BMC.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 7TH JANUARY, 2009
P.C.
We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. By consent, petition is taken up for final disposal.
as well. Despite submission of reply, no final order is stated to have been passed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondent authority to consider the petitioner's reply to a notice regarding unauthorized construction and issue an order within six weeks.
M/s. S.C. Motors
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
