The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition accordingly, directing the parties to comply with pending adjudication proceedings.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; directions issued for adjudication completion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2383 OF 2009
Pudumjee Plant Laboratories Ltd.. Petitioner
vs
Union of India & ors
.. Respondents
Mr.Vikram Nankani with Mr.V.Agarwal i.b Mr.P.K.Shetty for Petitioner Mr.R.V.Desai, Sr.Counsel with Mr.R.B.Pardeshi for Respondent o.2
CORAM : F.I.Rebello and J.H.Bhatia, JJ
DATED: 8th April, 2009
P.C.
adjudication should be completed at the earliest.
He seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner to file their reply to the show cause within two weeks from today. Respondents to
complete the adjudication within three months of
the receipt of the reply to the show cause.
With aforesaid directions, Writ Petition is
dismissed.
{ J.H.Bhatia, J }
{ F.I.Rebello, J }
Pudumjee Plant Laboratories Ltd.
Union of India
F.I. Rebello
J.H. Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
