Petitioner withdrew writ petition before judgment. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.
Rule discharged. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2250 OF 1993
Paresh Platinum Ltd. ... Petitioner.
vs
Union of India & ors. .. Respondents
..
Mr.Sunit Ragani i.b DSK Legal for Petitioner
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Respondent no.2
CORAM: F.I.Rebello and
J.H.Bhatia, JJ
DATED: 4th May, 2009
P.C.
1. Counsel appearing for the petitioner states on
instructions to withdraw the petition. Rule
discharged. No order as to costs.
{ J.H.Bhatia, J } { F.I.Rebello, J }
Paresh Platinum Ltd.
Union of India
F.I.Rebello
J.H.Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court