Dismissed
Ramkrishna Gajanan Patil v. Bhaskar Pillai and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/2217/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2217 OF 2009
Ramkrishna Gajanan Patil. ..Petitioner.
V/s.
Bhaskar Pillai & Anr. ..Respondents.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.2218 OF 2009
Ramkrishna Gajanan Patil. ..Petitioner.
V/s.
Shrikant K. Bhosale & Anr. ..Respondents.
Mr.G.S.Bhat for petitioner.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
DATE : MARCH 30, 2009.
P.C. :
1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioner.
2. Having regard to the concurrent findings of
fact, the conclusion reached by the Courts below is
inevitable. Hence no case for interference in
exercise of Writ jurisdiction. Both the Petitions
are dismissed.
(A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)
Ramkrishna Gajanan Patil
Bhaskar Pillai & Anr.
Shrikant K. Bhosale & Anr.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court