The High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to serve unserved respondents despite prior orders.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
T
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2079 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
None for the petitioner. Mr R.M.Patne, AGP, for respondent no.8. Mr Gautam Kamble, for respondent nos 3,5 to 7.
CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 24/09/2009
PC:
None appears for the petitioner. Even on last occasion, none appeared for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has not taken steps to serve the unserved respondents as per the order dated 1.7.2009 till this date. In the circumstances, I am constrained to dismiss this petition for non prosecution. Order accordingly.
(D.B.BHOSALE, J.)
2
Petitioner
Respondent No. 8
Respondents Nos. 3, 5 to 7
D.B.Bhosal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
