Sangali Sahakari Bank Ltd. v. the State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2020 OF 2009
Sangali Sahakari Bank Ltd.
..Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & 5 Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. V. A.Thorat, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harinder Toor i/b Mr. Subhash Bane for Petitioners
Mr. V. R. Dhond with Mr. T. N. Tripathi and Ms. Sapana Rachure i/b T. N. Tripathi & Co. for the Respondent No.4
Ms. Imam Calcuttawala, AGP for Respondents No.1 to 3
CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATE: 5th November , 2009
P.C. :
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Fourth Respondent states on instructions that, the Revision Application, which has been filed before the State Government, is not being pressed and the Fourth Respondent has instructions to
pursue the Writ Petition (Writ Petition No.1902 of 2009), which has been filed in
this Court. The Fourth Respondent cannot, obviously, pursue two remedies, one
before the State Government in the Revision Application and the Writ Petition
proceedings before this Court, simultaneously. In view of the statement which has been made on behalf of the Fourth Respondent, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner has instructions not to press the Petition. The Second Revision Application No.330 of 2009 filed by the Fourth Respondent before State Government shall in the circumstances, stand dismissed as withdrawn and all interim orders, if any, passed therein shall stand vacated. The Writ Petition is accordingly stand disposed of.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J)
Sangali Sahakari Bank Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
3rd Respondent
4th Respondent
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court