Writ petition where the High Court found no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction warranted in the fact situation of the case. Petitioner's plea dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Lsp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1869 of 2009
Maruti Krishna Patil ...Petitioner v/s. Vimal Maruti Patil ...Respondent Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure for the petitioner.
CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. DATED : MARCH 21, 2009
P.C.
. Heard Counsel for the Petitioner.
warranted in the fact situation of the present case. Dismissed.
[A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.]
Maruti Krishna Patil
Vimal Maruti Patil
A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
