The petitioners filed a writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner filed a praecipe to withdraw the petition. The Court disposed of the writ petition and the praecipe as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1868 OF 2009
M/s Jai Construction Co. ).. Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others
).. Respondents
Ms. Shilpa Kapil for the Petitioner.
Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader, for the State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 3RD DECEMBER 2009
P.C .
The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has filed a praecipe for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. Writ Petition disposed of as withdrawn. Praecipe also disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
M/s Jai Construction Co.
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
