Oral order in which the Court found that the petitioners' grievance had been ventilated following a communication from the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Shipping Road Transport & Highways, and disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.
Rule discharged. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 16 OF 1999
TRANSPORT & DOCK WORKERS UNION ... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... Respondent
Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. R. Raghuwanshi, Asst. Solicitor General & Ms. Rutiya Ambekar for Respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. J. Vaz, Central Government Standing Counsel for the Respondent nos. 1 and 2.
Coram:B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:20th April, 2009
ORAL ORDER
Advocate Raghuvanshi, Addl. Solicitor General of India, appearing for Respondent nos. 1 and 2, states that the grievance of the petitioners have been ventilated and he places on record the communication dated 28.08.2008, issued by Joint Secretary, Ministry of Shipping Road Transport & Highways, to his office in this respect. He states that appropriate notification in relation to its implementation is being issued as early as possible.
3. Rule discharged. No costs.
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
U. D. SALVI, J.
arp/*
TRANSPORT & DOCK WORKERS UNION
UNION OF INDIA
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
U. D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
