Bhau Dagdu Watkar v. the Land Acquisition Officer (No 17) Pune and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner. The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the petition and disposed of it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
srp
:1:
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1532 OF 2009.
--------------------------------l------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda l
of Coram, appearances, Court’s l
Orders or directions and l
Registrar’s orders. l Court’s or Judges’ Order
--------------------------------i------------------------------
Mr. G. K. Mourya i/b Mrs. P. H. Padnis for
the petitioner.
Mr. V. S. Gokhale, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM: S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ.
DATE: February 18, 2009.
P.C.
1. Heard. Learned counsel for
petitioner states that he may be allowed
to withdraw this petition. Petition is
allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of
as such.
(D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)
Petitioner
State
S.B.MHASE
D.B.BHOSALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court