The petitioner, a prisoner, sought parole. The respondent was willing to grant it but required a settle surety. The petitioner initially chose his sister but later nominated an aunt. The High Court allowed the writ petition.
Leave of parole granted to the petitioner, subject to furnishing a satisfactory surety as per rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 1488 OF 2009
Babu Vithal Rathod ...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Through jail
Mr. Rajesh More, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State.
CORAM : B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2009
P.C. :-
The petitioner seeks parole. To get the leave on parole is not denied by the respondent, but they submit that earlier, he
had submitted that his sister shall stand surety to him, but later on,
he changed his mind, and filed another application, saying that one of his aunts would remain surety.
2
The respondent is directed to grant leave of parole in accordance
with rules to the petitioner, subject to his furnishing surety to the satisfaction of the respondents.
BILAL NAZKI, J.
A.R. JOSHI, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the writ petition seeking parole for the petitioner.
Babu Vithal Rathod
The State of Maharashtra
Bilal Nazki
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
