The court dismissed the criminal writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner remained unrepresented and failed to provide the paper-book by the date of hearing.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Criminal Writ Petition No. 132 of 2009
Lilabai Gafur Shaikh
....Petitioner
v/s. Vijaysingh V. Dhumal ....Respondents
None for the petitioner.
Shri K.V. Saste, APP for the State.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
DATED:- November 09, 2009.
P.C.
None appears for the Petitioner.
book so far. Even in the past no one appeared for the Petitioner and the Court had ordered that the matter be placed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today none
appears for the Petitioner. Hence, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of representation or provision of copy of papers.
Lilabai Gafur Shaikh
Vijaysingh V. Dhumal
A.M. KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
