M.J.Bandgar v. Bhopat Bhavarlal Pandya and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition was withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel as infructuous. The court dismissed the petition on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1183 OF 2002
M.J.Bandgar V/s
Bhopat B.Pandya & Ors.
.. Petitioner
.. Respondents
Mr.I.A.Bagaria for the Petitioner. Mr.P.A.Pol, P.P.for Respondent Nos.2 to 4..
CORAM : J.N.PATEL &
A.A.SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 3rd November, 2009.
P.C.:
Mr.Bagaria, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed by the petitioner to withdraw the petition as it has become infructuous. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
( J.N.PATEL, J.)
(A.A.SAYED, J.)
M.J.Bandgar
Bhopat B.Pandya & Ors.
J.N.PATEL
A.A.SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court