In Criminal Writ Petition No.1175 of 2009, the court disposed of the petitioner's complaint regarding a pending furlough application. It was held that an order granting furlough had already been passed, rendering the petition unnecessary.
The criminal writ petition was disposed of as no order granting furlough remains to be challenged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1175 OF 2009
Gopal Bodhuram Gujar.... Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
{Through jail}
Ms P.H. Kantharia, APP, for the State.
CORAM: BILAL NAZKI &
A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED: AUGUST 31, 2009
P.C:
The grievance of the petitioner is
that his application for furlough was not being
decided. The learned APP, on instructions,
submits that an order granting furlough has
already been passed on 20-8-2009. In view of
the above submission, the petition does not
survive and is disposed of as such.
BILAL NAZKI, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a furlough application that has already been approved survives as a subject of a criminal writ petition.
Gopal Bodhuram Gujar
The State of Maharashtra
Bilal Nazki
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court