Petitioner sought withdrawal leave of W.P. No. 1150 of 2008, deemed infructuous. Court granted permission, disposed of petition.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[-1-]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
W.P.NO.1150 OF 2008
Rajesh Gupta ..Petitioner
Vs.
Brihan Mumbai Mahangar
Palika and Ors. ..Respondents
....
Ms.Ritu Singh Advocate for the Petitioner
Ms.S.M.Mondle Advocate for the Respondent-B.M.C.
CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 03, 2009
P.C.
1. Heard both sides.
2. The learned counsel for Municipal Corporation
for Greater Mumbai states that the structure has
already been demolished. The learned advocate for
the petitioner on instructions states that as the
petition has become infructuous, she seeks leave to
withdraw this petition. Leave as prayed for, is
[-2-]
granted.
3. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is
disposed of as such.
[J.N.PATEL, J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Rajesh Gupta
Brihan Mumbai Mahangar Palika
J.N.PATEL
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court