Disposed
Ramesh H.Dighe v. S.H.Dighe
Bombay HCTS/12/1996
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Consent terms executed by parties in a testamentary suit were taken on record, leading to the decreeing of a petition for letters of administration and the disposal of the suit upon withdrawal of caveat.
What did the court decide?
Petition for letters of administration with will annexed made absolute; Testamentary Suit No.12 of 1996 disposed of.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.12 OF 1996.
¶2
IN
¶3
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.396 OF 1995.
¶4
Ramesh H. Dighe ..Plaintiff
versus
¶5
S.H.Dighe ..Defendant
¶6
Ms.Velankar for the Plaintiffs
¶7
Mr.Khandeparkar for the defendant.
¶8
CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J.
DATED : 29th January, 2009.
P.C.
¶9
1. Plaintiff No.1(a) and 1(b) are present in
the Court. Defendant is present in the Court.
Consent terms dated today i.e. 29.1.2009, signed
by the parties to the suit i.e. plaintiff No.1(a),
1(b), defendant and their respective advocates are
tendered in the Court. They are taken on record
and marked as "X". Counsels on behalf of both the
sides pray for decree in terms of the consent
terms.
¶10
2. In view of the above, following Order is
passed:
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ramesh H. Dighe
- respondent
S.H. Dighe
Coram
AI extract
R.Y.Ganoo
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court