Application disposed as reference raised on same questions became admissible, with reference to be heard on merits.
Application dismissed; reference to be heard on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SALES TAX APPLICATION NO. 2 OF 2007 IN REFERNCE APPLICATION NO. 58 OF 2003
M/s. Pferd Tools Pvt. Ltd.
... Applicant
Versus
The Commissioner of Sales Tax
... Respondent
Mr. P.V. Surte i/by M.s. P.V. Surte & Co. for the Applicant.
Mrs. Uma Palsule Desai, A.G.P. for Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ.
DATED : JULY 24, 2009
P.C.
Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 22.8.2008, when it admitted application on two questions, the tribunal has made a reference bearing S.T.R. No. 37 of 2009 to this court on these two questions.
Once a reference is made on the very question, which are subject matter of the present application, the present application does not survive. The Sales Tax Reference No. 37 of 2009 to be heard on its own merits. Sales Tax application disposed of accordingly.
(D.G. KARNIK,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)
M/s. Pferd Tools Pvt. Ltd.
The Commissioner of Sales Tax
F.I. Rebello
D.G. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
