The High Court dismissed a review petition filed against an order dismissing a writ petition. The petitioner sought to reopen the termination issue based on new grounds regarding the respondent's alleged concurrent employment and subsequent appointments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO.106 OF 2009 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 960 OF 2009
Punjababa Govardhane Vidyavikas & Anr. .... Petitioners.
V/s
Govind Pundlik Jadhav and anr. .... Respondents.
Mr. M.M. Sathaye for petitioners. Mr. Anilkumar Patil for respondent No.1.
CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 1ST DECEMBER, 2009
P.C.:
2
said appeal was allowed by Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Nashik by order dated 09/09/2008 and the order of termination was set aside and direction was given to petitioners herein to reinstate respondent No.1 on the post of Assistant Teacher with 50% back-wages alongwith consequential benefits. Petitioners challenged the said order by filing the said Writ Petition. Petition was heard and by judgment and order dated 26/06/2009, the said Writ Petition was dismissed.
3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient grounds are made out for reviewing the order dismissing the writ petition challenging termination.
Whether the ground of a finding of gainful employment by the respondent justifies setting aside the operative order.
Punjababa Govardhane Vidyavikas
Govind Pundlik Jadhav
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
