Review petitions filed to challenge dismissal of second appeals concerning specific performance of a contract. The High Court held that re-contesting findings on readiness and willingness is impermissible in review and dismissed the petitions for lack of merit.处置：dismissed
The Review Petitions were dismissed for lack of merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
lgc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION'
REVIEW PETITION NO.17 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.840 OF 2007
Yadav Hari Pagire : Petitioner. Versus Raosaheb Rangrao Jadhav : Respondent.
ALONG WITH
REVIEW PETITION NO.18 OF 2008 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.848 OF 2007
Yadav Hari Pagire : Petitioner. Versus Raosaheb Rangrao Jadhav & anr : Respondents.
Shri.Shankar P. Thorat for the Petitioners. Shri.Ramesh Dubey i/by M/s. Jay & Co. for the Respondents.
CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J DATED : JULY 03, 2009
COMMON P.C. (IN CHAMBER).
2
3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the review petition can successfully contest the courts' findings on the Plaintiff's readiness and willingness to perform.
Whether the grounds raised justify a review under Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yadav Hari Pagire
Raosaheb Rangrao Jadhav
R.M. Savant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court