The petitioner sought to withdraw the PIL with liberty to raise the issue before the competent authority. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Petition dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to make representation to the State before the competent authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 77 OF 2009
Rashtriya Ekta Sangh (Mumbai) .. Petitioner.
V/s.
State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent.
Mr. K.H. Holambe Patil for the Petitioner. Mr. G.W. Mattos AGP for Respondent -State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
DATED : 13TH AUGUST, 2009
P.C. :
Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner wishes to withdraw this
Petition with liberty to make representation to the State by raising the same
issue before the competent Authority.
Petition is dismissed as withdraw with liberty as prayed for.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A. M. KHANWILKAR,J.
Rashtriya Ekta Sangh (Mumbai)
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
A. M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
