was passed on 6/2/1995, he came to know about the said decree only on 8/6/2007. It is submitted that when he applied for certified copy of the said decree, it was delivered to him on 25/7/2007. He has stated that, thereafter, he approached the other defendants who were having one difficulty or the other and as a result Notices of Motion could not be filed till February 2008. One of the grounds taken by him in the affidavit in support viz. (G), is that the acknowledgment annexed to the affidavit of service dated 17/1/1995 is forged and fabricated. It is further stated that defendant No.1 – partnership firm was not in existence on the said date and the acknowledgment card shows that defendant No.1 accepted service some time in the month of December, 1994. He has further averred that by an agreement of absorption dated 1/7/1992, original defendant No. 1 – firm was absorbed in Denver Packaging Pvt. Ltd., which is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act. It is further stated that seal/rubber stamp used to show the service of writ of summons also could not have been put on the acknowledgment card since, on that date, firm itself was not in existence and, therefore, the said rubber stamp/seal could not have been in existence on that date. It is further submitted that though an ex parte decree was passed on 6/2/1995, execution application was filed in 2007. Further, it is submitted that plaintiffs were aware
