Disposed
Jubiliant Organosys Ltd. v. Atulya Mafatlal
Bombay HCNMS/3241/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
USJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3241 OF 2009 IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1726 OF 2009
Jubiliant Organosys Ltd... Plaintiff
V/s.
Atulya Mafatlal .. Defendant
Mr. Suresh Patil i/by Utangale & Co. for the plaintiff
Sanidha Vedpathak i/by Maneksha & Sethna for defendant in
support.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :
1. Perused the Motion in affidavit in support. There is
a delay of one day in filing the Vakalatnama in the subject
Summary Suit. For the reasons set out in the affidavit in
support, delay is condoned. Motion made absolute in terms
of prayer clause (a) and (b). No order as to costs.
S.C. Dharmadikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court