be proceeded with by the Plaintiff in this Court. Even if the goods of the Defendants under the impugned trade mark are not sold or available in India, yet, the usage in the course of a trade is something which can be said to be infringement provided other requirements of Section 29 are satisfied. It is clear from a reading of Section 29(6) that all aspects of usage are covered so that the protection available to a registered Trade Mark is not frustrated and defeated. Similarly, the rights which go alongwith registration have also to be made meaningful and complete. If the effect of registration is that the person holding the registration/registered proprietor, has exclusive rights, then, to enable him to proceed in cases of infringement that Section 29 is worded in widest terms. The Plaintiffs have pointed out that they have obtained the registration of the Trade Mark label in respect of the goods falling under Class 33. They have also obtained registration of the word mark. Thus, both label marks and word mark are registered. They are in respect of both alcoholic and nonalcoholic drinks. Registration of a trade mark and issuance of a certificate to that effect is something that is provided in Section 28. If infringement, upon registration, is something which is actionable and the law enables the registered trade mark holder to proceed against persons who are using the trade mark during the course of their trade and more particularly, in the manner provided in Section 29(6), then, it is futile to urge that the Plaintiff in this case cannot proceed against the First Defendant. Section 30 which is relied upon by Mr. Chitnis is of no assistance in this case to him because
