In a civil notice of motion suit, the High Court at Bombay dismissed the proceeding for want of prosecution due to the plaintiff abating in pursuing the matter filed in 1993.
Notice of Motion No. 1010 of 1993 was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1010 OF 1993 IN
SUIT NO. 3184 OF 1990
Anup Kishorechandra Joshi...Plaintiff
vs.
Kantilal Madhavji Joshi & Ors....Defendants
and
Shri Chandubhai Alabhai Padhiyar & Ors...Respondents
None for the Plaintiff.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 1, 2009
P.C. :-
None appears on behalf of the plaintiff. It
appears that Notice of Motion was taken out in the
year 1993. It appears that the plaintiff is not keen
in pursuing the notice of motion.
Notice of Motion, accordingly, is dismissed
for want of prosecution.
(V.M. KANADE, J.)
Anup Kishorechandra Joshi
Kantilal Madhavji Joshi & Ors.
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court