The court noted a bonafide mistake and explanation for a 102-day delay in filing appeals. It condoned the delay and disposed of the Notices of Motion, listing the appeals for admission on 15 October 2009.
Notice of Motion disposed; Appeals listed for admission on 15th October 2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.697 OF 2009 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO.106 OF 2009 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1164 OF 2007 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.260 OF 2004 IN AWARD DATED 30th MAY 2001 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.698 OF 2009 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO.107 OF 2009 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.795 OF 2006 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.260 OF 2004 IN AWARD DATED 30th MAY 2001
Mr.Naman Madhav Patel ...Applicant Versus Sundaram Finance Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Amit Shroff for Applicant.
Mr.J.P.Sen with Mr.G.R.Mehta for Respondents.
...... CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 29, 2009.
: 2 :
P.C. :
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 102 days in filing the Appeals should be condoned.
Whether the Notices of Motion should be disposed of after condoning the delay.
Mr.Naman Madhav Patel
Sundaram Finance Ltd. & Ors.
Swatanter Kumar
A.M.Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
