An appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, though an interim order was directed to continue for ten days. Consequently, the Notice of Motion was disposed of as it did not survive.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The interim order was directed to continue for ten days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
APPEAL NO.10 OF 2009 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1592 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2946 OF 2006 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.176 OF 2009
Infrastructure Leasing Financial Services Limited.
...Appellant.
Vs. Vijaya V. Prabhu. ...Respondent.
Mr. Cyrus Ardeshir i/b. M/s.Negandhi S & H. for the Appellant. Mr. V.P. Vaze for the Respondent.
..... CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. January 14, 2009.
P.C. :
At the request of the Counsel appearing on behalf of the
Appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. It is, however,
directed that the interim order will continue for ten days from today and would automatically come to an end unless otherwise directed by
specific order.
2
In view of the disposal of the appeal, the Notice of Motion
does not survive and is accordingly disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Infrastructure Leasing Financial Services Limited
Vijaya V. Prabhu
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
