The High Court of Bombay fixed a future date for hearing the appeal regarding a notice of motion and clarified that a continuation of the order below does not extend to any subsequent orders passed by the competent court regarding the suit property.
Continued hearing and clarification regarding effect of subsequent orders on suit property.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1344 OF 2009
IN
APPEAL NO.161 OF 2009 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3514 OF 2008
IN
SUIT NO.2715 OF 2007
Vimal Builders.
..Appellant.
v/s.
Nand Kumar Anant Vaity & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr.D.D.Madan i/b. M/s. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for appellant.
Mr.Shailesh Shah i/b. P.M.Shah for Respondent No.41.
CORAM:- SWATANTER KUMAR,CJ. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
DATED :- SEPTEMBER 30, 2009.
P.C.
the appeal. However, we clarify that if there is any order passed by the competent Court in relation to the suit property, this will not operate to the
extent of that order. Notice of Motion disposed of accordingly.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
Vimal Builders
Nand Kumar Anant Vaity
SWATANTR P ALPAPA
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
