Appellant challenged the non-maintainability of a writ petition following a Full Bench judgment. The High Court, relying on that precedent, dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal without hearing.
Appeal dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 18844 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2009
Mr. Vithal Shankar Kad
).. Appellant
Versus
Mr. Kisan Khandu Dhule and another
).. Respondents
Ms. Bharti Gaud i/b Jay & Co. for the Appellant. Mr. G.R. Agrawal for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 11TH NOVEMBER 2009
P.C.
With the consent of the learned Counsel appearing
for the parties, Appeal taken up for hearing.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mohd. Riyazur Rehman Siddiqui vs Dy. Director of Health ServicesRelied on¶15
_Mohd. Riyazur Rehman Siddiqui vs Dy. Director of Health Services_, 2009 (1) ALL MR 413
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Vithal Shankar Kad
Mr. Kisan Khandu Dhule and another
Swatanter Kumar
A. M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
