The appellant in a letters patent appeal challenged a writ petition but died before the appeal was pursued. The court dismissed the appeal as not pursued due to the appellant's death causing the cause of action not to survive.
Appeal dismissed as not pursued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.190 of 2009 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1493 of 1993
Shri Rasiklal T. Dalal
...Appellant
v/s.
Smt. Sukanyaben . Vakil & ors.
...Respondents
Shri N.K.Singh i/b. M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Appellant. Shri A.H. Palekar, AGP for the State.
CORAM:- SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
DATED:- August 18, 2009.
P.C.
It is stated by the Learned Counsel that Appellant has died and hence the cause of action does not survive. Therefore, Learned Counsel does not wish to pursue the Appeal. Dismissed as not pursued.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
Shri Rasiklal T. Dalal
Smt. Sukanyaben . Vakil & ors.
SWATANTER KUMAR
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
