Disposed
P.M.Dwarkadas. v. Rakesh Kapoor.
Bombay HCINPT/85/2007
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The insolvency petition was disposed of based on consent terms signed by the parties and their advocates, which were recorded and marked for identification.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶2
VP H
¶3
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶4
INSOLVENCY PETITION No. 85 OF 2007
¶5
P. M. Dwarkadas... Petitioner
¶6
Vs
¶7
Rakesh Kapoor
¶8
...Respondent
¶9
Mr. K. T. Kukreja, for the petitioner.
¶10
Mr. Munir Merchant, for the Debtors.
¶11
CORAM: S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.
¶12
DATED: MARCH 3, 2009.
¶13
P.C.:
----
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
P. M. Dwarkadas
- respondent
Rakesh Kapoor
Coram
AI extract
S. J. Vazifdar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Paints Employees Union Vs Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd. and Another
Haji M.C. Abdul Kadar Vs Asst. Municipal Commissioner and Ors. and George David Pereira and Ors.
Sagar Majur Sahakari Sanstha (Proposed)and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
The Official Assignee, High Court, Bombay. Vs Nikhil Rasiklal Dalia, Insolvent, (Own Petition)