Appeal dismissed on the ground that the issue involved was identical to one decided in Customs Appeal No.12 of 2007, rendering the question framed moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CUSTOMS APPEAL NO.34 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) ....Appellant.
v.
Mr.Bajirao P. Ghosalkar ....Respondent.
Mr.R.V.Desai, Sr.Counsel with A.D.Kango adv. for the
Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.H.BHATIA, JJ.
DATE : 29th April, 2009.
PC :
1.Issue involved in this petition is similar to
what was an issue in Customs Appeal No.12 of 2007 in
the case of Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) v.
M/s. Noble Asset Company Ltd. & Others decided on
4th August, 2008.
2.In the light of that, question as framed would
not arise. Consequently, the appeal stands dismissed.
( J.H.BHATIA, J.) ( F.I.REBELLO, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the issue involved had arisen previously in Customs Appeal No.12 of 2007.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) v. M/s. Noble Asset Company Ltd. & OthersReferred¶8
Customs Appeal No.12 of 2007 in the case of Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) v. M/s. Noble Asset Company Ltd. & Others
The Commissioner of Customs (Preventive)
Mr. Bajirao P. Ghosalkar
F.I. REBELLO
J.H. BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court