The chamber summons, which allowed amendment of pleadings with a delay condonation, was disposed of by the court.
Chamber Summons allowed with two-weeks' time for amendment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
CST NO. 69 OF 2009
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.68 OF 2003
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.767 OF 2002
Vandana Dinanath Dalvi...Plaintiff/
Applicant
Vs.
Mahadeo Atmaram Gavankar ...Defendant/
Respondent
Mr.B.G. Saraf for Plaintiff
None for Defendant
CORAM: V.M. KANADE J.
DATE: 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2009
P.C.
1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the
Applicant.
2.Though the Respondent- Original Defendant was served,
none appears on behalf of the Respondent.
3.This Chamber Summons was prepared for brining the legal
heirs of Sneha Samant who is the sister of the deceased on
record. Delay caused in filing this Chamber Summons is
condoned for the reasons stated in the affidavit in support.
4.Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses a
and b.
5. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks.
6. Chamber Summons is disposed of.
V.M. KANADE J.
Vandana Dinanath Dalvi
Mahadeo Atmaram Gavankar
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court