COURT
condonation of 22-day delay in filing caveat; affidavit extension granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.65 OF 2009 IN PETITION NO.994 OF 2008
Sanjiv Goenka alias Aanjeev Lalta Prasad Goenka alias S.L. Goenka
..Petitioner.
Vs. Sangita Sanjay Patodia nee Saangita Goenka ..Caveator.
None for the Petitioner. Ms. Sheetal U. Malvankar for the Caveator.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
30th July, 2009.
P.C. :
The Chamber Summons is for condoning the delay of 22 days in filing the caveat and for extension of time by six weeks for filing an affidavit in support of the caveat. The Chamber Summons has been duly served and the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Caveator undertakes to file an affidavit of service within a period of one week from today. There is no objection to the grant of relief in the Chamber
2
Summons. The delay has been satisfactorily explained and there is no deliberate and willful delay. The Chamber Summons is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c ).
Sanjiv Goenka
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
