In a PIL regarding the representation of a petitioner, the Court held the matter infructuous as the Investigating Agency had already filed the routine report under Section 173 CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.3 OF 2009
Durukumar Shambhulal Chandanani ...Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry Welfare, New Delhi & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.J.Chandnani i/b Mr.D.S.Chandnani for Petitioner in-person.
Ms.A.S.Pai, A.P.P. for State.
Ms.Heena Shah with Mr.D.N.Salvi for Union of India.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : OCTOBER 1, 2009.
P.C. :
Investigating Agency has already filed the routine report under Section 173
of the Criminal Procedure Code in accordance with law. This statement is
not disputed by the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner. Therefore,
we dispose of this Petition as having become infructuous. However, it is
: 2 :
open for the Petitioner to appear before the Court of competent jurisdiction
and take all pleas which he deems fit in accordance with law.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
Durukumar Shambhulal Chandanani
The Union of India
Swatanter Kumar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
