Petitioner withdrew Criminal Public Interest Litigation No.1 of 2009. Court allowed withdrawal with liberty to file an appropriate writ petition in the name of an affected party.
Public Interest Litigation disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file writ in name of affected party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.1 OF 2009
Arunna Harishchandra Patil
... Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and others
... Respondents
Mr. N.N. Gavankar with Mr. Irfan Sait for the petitioner. Smt. V.R. Bhosale, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE : 26TH MARCH, 2009
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this Public Interest Litigation with liberty to file an appropriate writ petition in the name of an affected party which the petitioner is stated to be. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Liberty as prayed granted.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Arunna Harishchandra Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
