In a criminal miscellaneous application, the High Court of Bombay, Goa granted leave to the applicant to prefer an appeal against a judgment and order by the lower court dismissing a complaint and acquitting the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 221 OF 2009
IN
STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 2000 OF 2009
FALLARY ENTERPRISES THROUGH PARTNER CHINMAY G. FALLARY ... Applicant Versus SANDIP ENTERPRISES THROUGH PROPRIETOR SANDIP AGASKAR ... Respondent
Mr. Sanjay M. Chodankar,Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. J.P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the respondent.
Coram:U. D. SALVI, J.
Date:6th November, 2009
P.C.
Service complete.
U. D. SALVI, J.
vn
FALLARY ENTERPRISES THROUGH PARTNER CHINMAY G. FALLARY
SANDIP ENTERPRISES THROUGH PROPRIETOR SANDIP AGASKAR
U. D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
