This criminal revision application allowed upon settlement between parties. The High Court acquitted the petitioners of Section 138 NI Act, set aside conviction, cancelled bail bonds, and permitted withdrawal of deposited amounts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2009
M/S. RAJNIL LAND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND 2 ORS., ... Petitioners
Versus
MR. DAULATRAO YESHWANTRAO CHOWGULE AND ANR., ... Respondents
Mr. Siddesh Shet, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr V. A. Lawande for respondent no.1.
Coram:U. D. SALVI, J.
Date:10th November, 2009
P.C.
Heard.
sentence passed by the Learned JMFC, Vasco-da-gama is set aside. Bail bond of the accused stands cancelled.
U. D. SALVI, J.
vn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should be acquitted of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after settlement and court grant of permission to compound.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Rajnil Land Developers Pvt Ltd
Rajesh Neurekar
Vijaylaxmi R. Neurekar
Mr. Daulatrao Yeshwantrao Chowgule
U. D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
