The petitioners sought to withdraw a winding-up petition settled out of court. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition with no order as to costs.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
mgj
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Company Petition No.55 of of 2009
In the matter of winding up
of Bi9lcare Ltd.
DEG Deutsche Investitions-und
Entwicklungsgesellschaft ..Petitioners
Ms.Ferzana Behramkamdin i/b FZB & Associates
for petitioner.
Mr.A.H.Delhiwala i/b Kanga and Co. for
respondent.
CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA J.
6th August, 2009
P.C.
1Learned Advocate appearing for the
petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition,
as settled out of Court. Learned Advocate for
the respondents state that he has no
objection if the petition is allowed to be
withdrawn. The petition is not yet admitted.
In view thereof, the petition is dismissed as
withdrawn with no order as to costs.
DEG Deutsche Investitions-und Entwicklungsgesellschaft
Bi9lcare Ltd.
S.J.KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court