The High Court disposed of a contempt petition where the parties filed consent terms settling the matter. The terms were taken on record and the petition was accordingly disposed of.
The contempt petition was disposed of based on consent terms filed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.46 OF 2009
IN
SUIT NO.578 OF 2008
Mr. Sunil Vasudeo Khandare & Anr.
...Petitioners
Vs.
M/s. Mahavir Enterprises & Anr.
...Respondents
M/s. S. Ashwinikumar & Co. for Petitioners
B.B. Parekh for Respondent No.2
CORAM: V.M. KANADE J.
DATED: 10TH SEPTEMBER, 2009
P.C.
1.Parties have settled the matter and they are filed the
consent terms.
2.The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked �X�
for the purpose of identification. The Consent Terms are
signed by the Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 and the Respondents
and by their respective advocates.
3.In view of the consent terms filed by the parties, the
contempt petition is disposed of.
Mr. Sunil Vasudeo Khandare & Anr.
M/s. Mahavir Enterprises & Anr.
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court