Single-judge contempt petition dismissed on merits for lack of any disclosed contempt and because contemners were not named or their addresses disclosed.
Petition dismissed as misconceived for lack of named contemners and undisclosed addresses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRI. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.5 OF 2009
Mr. Shamim Fazal Ahmad & Ors. .... Petitioners
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors..... Respondents
Shri Dnyaneshwahar Deshmukh for
the Petitioners.
CORAM: BILAL NAZKI &
DATED: SEPTEMBER 23, 2009
P.C:
We do not find any contempt having
been committed as disclosed in the petition.
Moreover, neither the contemners have been
named nor their addresses disclosed. The
petition is misconceived and is dismissed as
such.
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition discloses any case of contempt of contempt
Mr. Shamim Fazal Ahmad & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Bilal Nazki
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court