The High Court made a chamber summons absolute, permitting a transfer in favor of a proposed defendant in Suit No. 296 of 2009, with amendments to be completed within two weeks.
Chamber summons made absolute; amendments to be carried out within two weeks; amended plaint to be served thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1833 OF 2009
IN
SUIT NO.296 OF 2009
Vivek Ganesh Bharti .. Plaintiff Versus Manoharlal H. Ahuja and Anr. .. Defendants.
Ms.Prachi Tatkate for plaintiff Mr.Y.R.Mishra for defendant No.1
Mr.Rahul Dwarkadas with Ms.Shishavi Kadakia i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for defendant No.2.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : December 1, 2009.
P.C.:
1] Perused the chamber summons and affidavit in support. There is no affidavit in reply. Considering the contents of the affidavit in support and finding that the transfer is effected in favour of the proposed defendant, chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendments to be carried out within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Amended plaint to be served within two weeks thereafter.
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)
S.C. Dharmadikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
