This is a consent order in suit no.3107 of 2003. The court recorded signed consent terms and disposed of the chamber summons accordingly.
Consent terms accepted; chamber summons disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1679 OF 2009
IN
SUIT NO.3107 OF 2003
M/s.Mepro Pharmaceuticals Pvt.Ltd.
vs.
M/s.Vanraj & Co. Pvt.Ltd.
Ms Kavita A.Shah i/b Mr.A.G.Shah for the plaintiffs
Mr.Bharat Shah Director of plaintiff present
Ms Sunita Poddar i/b Ranjana Parikh for the defendants
Mr.Avinash V.Naik Director of defendant present.
CORAM :A.S.OKA,J.
DATE : DECEMBER 10, 2009
P.C.
1The learned counsel for the parties have tendered
the consent terms duly signed by the plaintiffs and
defendants and their respective Advocates. The consent
terms are taken on record and marked `X� for
identification. The undertakings contained in the consent
terms are accepted. The chamber summons is disposed of
in terms of the consent terms.
2The parties to act upon an authenticated copy of
this order.
JUDGE
A.S.OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court