This is a one-line order exercising jurisdiction to condone delay and dispense with notice, directing registration of the appeal.
Notice on respondents dispensed with; delay condoned; office directed to register the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 76 OF 2009 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 22608 OF 2009 IN FERA APPEAL NO. 35 OF 2009
Mahesh Kanakia ... Appellant
Versus
The Special Directorate of Enforcement
... Respondent
None for the Applicant.
Mr. A.S. Rao with Mr. Y.R. Mishra for Respondents.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 18, 2009
P.C.
Notice on respondents dispensed with for the order to be passed.
Considering the cause shown, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal.
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
Mahesh Kanakia
The Special Directorate of Enforcement
F.I. REBELLO
J.H. BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
